A causal roadmap for generating high-quality real-world evidence.

Increasing emphasis on the use of real-world evidence (RWE) to support clinical policy and regulatory decision-making has led to a proliferation of guidance, advice, and frameworks from regulatory agencies, academia, professional societies, and industry. A broad spectrum of studies use real-world data (RWD) to produce RWE, ranging from randomized trials with outcomes assessed using RWD to fully observational studies. Yet, many proposals for generating RWE lack sufficient detail, and many analyses of RWD suffer from implausible assumptions, other methodological flaws, or inappropriate interpretations. The Causal Roadmap is an explicit, itemized, iterative process that guides investigators to prespecify study design and analysis plans; it addresses a wide range of guidance within a single framework. By supporting the transparent evaluation of causal assumptions and facilitating objective comparisons of design and analysis choices based on prespecified criteria, the Roadmap can help investigators to evaluate the quality of evidence that a given study is likely to produce, specify a study to generate high-quality RWE, and communicate effectively with regulatory agencies and other stakeholders. This paper aims to disseminate and extend the Causal Roadmap framework for use by clinical and translational researchers; three companion papers demonstrate applications of the Causal Roadmap for specific use cases.

Aiding the Adoption of Master Protocols by Optimizing Patient Engagement.

Master protocols (MPs) are an important addition to the clinical trial repertoire. As defined by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), this term means "a protocol designed with multiple sub-studies, which may have different objectives (goals) and involve coordinated efforts to evaluate one or more investigational drugs in one or more disease subtypes within the overall trial structure." This means we now have a unique, scientifically based MP that describes how a clinical trial will be conducted using one or more potential candidate therapies to treat patients in one or more diseases. Patient engagement (PE) is also a critical factor that has been recognized by FDA through its Patient-Focused Drug Development (PFDD) initiative, and by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), which states on its website that it has been actively interacting with patients since the creation of the Agency in 1995. We propose that utilizing these PE principles in MPs can make them more successful for sponsors, providers, and patients. Potential benefits of MPs for patients awaiting treatment can include treatments that better fit a patient's needs; availability of more treatments; and faster access to treatments. These make it possible to develop innovative therapies (especially for rare diseases and/or unique subpopulations, e.g., pediatrics), to minimize untoward side effects through careful dose escalation practices and, by sharing a control arm, to lower the probability of being assigned to a placebo arm for clinical trial participants. This paper is authored by select members of the American Statistical Association (ASA)/DahShu Master Protocol Working Group (MPWG) People and Patient Engagement (PE) Subteam. DahShu is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, founded to promote research and education in data science. This manuscript does not include direct feedback from US or non-US regulators, though multiple regulatory-related references are cited to confirm our observation that improving patient engagement is supported by regulators. This manuscript represents the authors' independent perspective on the Master Protocol; it does not represent the official policy or viewpoint of FDA or any other regulatory organization or the views of the authors' employers. The objective of this manuscript is to provide drug developers, contract research organizations (CROs), third party capital investors, patient advocacy groups (PAGs), and biopharmaceutical executives with a better understanding of how including the patient voice throughout MP development and conduct creates more efficient clinical trials. The PE Subteam also plans to publish a Plain Language Summary (PLS) of this publication for clinical trial participants, patients, caregivers, and the public as they seek to understand the risks and benefits of MP clinical trial participation.

Application of Bayesian methods to accelerate rare disease drug development: scopes and hurdles.

BACKGROUND: Design and analysis of clinical trials for rare and ultra-rare disease pose unique challenges to the practitioners. Meeting conventional power requirements is infeasible for diseases where sample sizes are inherently very small. Moreover, rare disease populations are generally heterogeneous and widely dispersed, which complicates study enrollment and design. Leveraging all available information in rare and ultra-rare disease trials can improve both drug development and informed decision-making processes. MAIN TEXT: Bayesian statistics provides a formal framework for combining all relevant information at all stages of the clinical trial, including trial design, execution, and analysis. This manuscript provides an overview of different Bayesian methods applicable to clinical trials in rare disease. We present real or hypothetical case studies that address the key needs of rare disease drug development highlighting several specific Bayesian examples of clinical trials. Advantages and hurdles of these approaches are discussed in detail. In addition, we emphasize the practical and regulatory aspects in the context of real-life applications. CONCLUSION: The use of innovative trial designs such as master protocols and complex adaptive designs in conjunction with a Bayesian approach may help to reduce sample size, select the correct treatment and population, and accurately and reliably assess the treatment effect in the rare disease setting.

Accelerating Rare Disease Drug Development: Lessons Learned from Muscular Dystrophy Patient Advocacy Groups.

With scientific and molecular advancements related to disease pathogenesis, advances in gene and stem cell therapies, and the promise of lucrative markets for biopharmaceutical companies, there has been a rapid expansion in the number of potential new muscular dystrophy (MD) treatments. The first champion for a newly diagnosed MD patient and their caregivers is typically an MD-specific patient advocacy group (PAG). Muscular dystrophy PAGs have been among the most active in the rare disease drug development space. Notable achievements in the last decade include promulgating the first U.S. clinical research guidance, setting up registries and natural history studies, and investing in companies-some of which have brought potentially disease-modifying products to the market. This paper will discuss five key strategies that have been successfully employed by MD PAGs to advance treatments: (1) creating a national registry, (2) understanding the barriers to identifying patients with certain subtypes of muscular dystrophy to participate in clinical trials, (3) partnering with the biopharmaceutical industry, (4) collaborating with the regulators, and (5) incorporating market access and use insights early in clinical development. While clearly helpful within the MD community, these tactics could also be employed by PAGs representing other types of rare diseases.

Use of Big Data to Aid Patient Recruitment for Clinical Trials Involving Biosimilars and Rare Diseases.

Patient recruitment and retention are arguably the greatest challenges to the timely execution of clinical trials. This is particularly true in the case of trials involving biosimilars and those focused on rare diseases. For biosimilars, recruitment success typically hinges on difficulty of access to reimbursement for the originator product and may be hindered by competition from studies with other biosimilars and those with new chemical entities. For rare diseases, recruitment success depends not only on finding enough patients but also on retaining them for the duration of the trial. Historical success with patient recruitment-in addition to site qualifications-needs to be considered in parallel with current market competition and results in an ever-changing patient recruitment environment. Multiple companies supporting the biopharmaceutical industry, such as Contract Research Organizations, have begun to leverage sophisticated data modeling tools and techniques to find additional patients for biosimilar and rare disease trials and/or to find patients more quickly. In addition, these companies seek to better understand the population of interest and refine their statistical assumptions when conducting clinical trials or real-world analyses. The largest and most well-established companies that support the biopharmaceutical industry now have unparalleled access to big data from clinical trials, electronic health records, medical claims, laboratory tests, and prescriptions. This paper will discuss how big data can be harnessed to aid patient recruitment with a focus on clinical trials for biosimilars and orphan rare diseases.

Updating the Clinical Picture of Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy: Ramifications for Drug Development With Potential Solutions.

BACKGROUND: Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a complex, inheritable, and rare muscle disease that affects the entire body. The major symptom of FSHD is progressive weakening and loss of skeletal muscles. The usual location of these weaknesses at onset is the origin of the name: face (facio), shoulder girdle (scapulo), and upper arms (humeral). FSHD appears to have varying molecular and genetic determinants with commensurate differences in disease progression. METHODS: Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (MD) is probably the most prevalent form of MD but has neither disease-modifying treatments nor a cure. As the mechanism of action becomes further elucidated, more biopharmaceutical companies are investing capital into finding treatments for patients with FSHD. Sponsors of treatments for FSHD patients should be aware of some of the common misconceptions associated with FSHD drug development with the goal of optimizing the chance to prove safety and efficacy for each potential treatment for FSHD in the clinical trial setting. RESULTS: Four major topics with potential clinical manifestations for patients with FSHD will be discussed related to muscle weakness, respiratory issues, animal models and prevalence. CONCLUSION: The authors offer multiple solutions to help counteract misconceptions with each scenario during clinical trial drug development.

Challenges With the Development of Biosimilars in Asia for Western Markets: An Overview and Suggested Solutions.

There is a great interest from companies located in Asia to bring biosimilars into Western markets such as the United States, European Union, and Canada, because these are lucrative markets with patents expiring or close to expiry for many originator biologics. Although many sponsors are successfully developing and marketing biosimilars for their own countries, there is an increasing interest among companies in China, Hong Kong, India, Korea, Taiwan, and other Asian countries in targeting markets in the West. As a result, there is widespread interest among these companies in learning about the requirements for regulatory approval in Western countries. This paper, specifically prepared for this journal's wide readership, presents an overview of common challenges identified while working on global biosimilar programs for companies in Asia targeting registration in the West, and also proffers some suggested solutions.